Genuinely surprised that the first TV show/film I’ve actually seen personally (not just read about) that has a character with diabetes and hasn’t done anything re: handling the diabetes to make me want to throw things at the director about is The Godfather: Part III.
Tag: diabetes
meh
Last night’s blood sugar before sleeping: 266. Bolused a correction, figured things would be fine in the morning.
Blood sugar this morning: 270.
Check for ketones: small to medium.
Correct with a shot, crack open a fresh bottle of Nestle Pure Life.
Today, we hydrate!
I’m disappointed in Jon Stewart for deciding that it was an awesome idea to attempt to shame bigots by shaming fat people and people with a chronic illness.
Type 2 diabetes, like all types of diabetes, is dependent on genetic predisposition. Many things can contribute to diabetes actually occurring; weight can be a factor, but it is not in itself a cause.
9 Diabetes Terms We Can Do Without
Let’s get one thing straight: Your diabetes doesn’t define you. Character is forged by your life experiences and your environment—not by how well your pancreas works. Yet we allow certain terms to creep into our vernacular until we’re defining ourselves and others, too. That needs to stop, starting with the words and phrases below.
there seems to be some confusion on the diabetes tag so i wrote a helpful list of those who are allowed to decide whether jokes about diabetes are offensive, ignorant, rude, etc.
- people with diabetes
that’s it. that’s the list.
Seriously. And to anyone who sees this, you’ll probably want to avoid reading the reblogs.
Because a lot of them are chock full of assholes who think they get to decide what is offensive, and to whom certain things can be offensive, and to what degree anything can be offensive to anybody.
One of the responses I see every time I reblog something related to diabetes and go through the notes is something along the lines of, “Get over it! It’s not bad at all (or not as bad as X)!”
I’m going to ignore that that’s derailing and that intersectionality is a thing.
There really is nothing like having a disease that has a stigma, though.
And there really is nothing like never being able to completely relax and having to monitor every single thing your body does when that illness is chronic.
I think, more than anything though, diabetes jokes are proof that people don’t want people who are either fat or chronically ill to “just be healthy.”
It’s proof that people are pieces of shit who just want something to laugh at.
That stigma does affect my life. It doesn’t just make me feel shitty or contribute to my anxiety. It doesn’t just cause some people to look at me with disgust. It influences the reactions that people have when they find out I’m diabetic and affects whether or not they’ll be willing to help me if I’m in medical trouble and need their (a stranger’s) help. I can’t tell you how many times my knees have buckled in public and I’ve been unable to walk, move, or talk and almost died because my blood sugar went low due to unforeseeable circumstances. The pervasive attitudes about diabetes — that it’s either my fault or that it’s NOT a serious illness — contribute TREMENDOUSLY to the amount of help I may be able to get and whether or not I’ll live if I’m not able to help myself.
I don’t know how people don’t see that.
Bolded for emphasis.
Nothing’s Sweeter Than Life: Dangers of Drinking Crystal Light
I am so over posts like this. Get your pro-natural, anti-science, bull-shit, propagandized ad-posts off my tag. Seriously. No matter how many times you link your website to a claim that has no support, I won’t click it.
Until you have unmitigated proof that something is bad for me, I’m going to continue to use it as the alternative to sugar, which actually has hard proof as being bad for me. I can consume it, I just shouldn’t. As a diabetic, I shouldn’t have to live off of water and black decaf coffee just because your dreadlocked, no-poo, all-hemp, kale-eating ass thinks I should.
So here is the breakdown, alright?.
Aspartame – Aspartame was discovered in 1965, and approved for use in food products by the FDA in 1974. In 10 years of testing, they found no evidence that aspartame is harmful for human consumption (except for the development of babies in utero and people with phenylketonuria- which is a rare inherited metabolic disease). The FDA even responded to public paranoia and rescinded approval until 1981. They still found no evidence that aspartame is harmful. For 6 years after that, groups of people tried to contest it and demanded that all of the research be thoroughly reviewed AGAIN, by the CDC. After 6 years of review, there was still no evidence found to support fear theories. In 47 years of ongoing research, and human trials, there is still no evidence that aspartame has any negative effects in the general population (again, only during pregnancy and with PKA). The lasting belief that aspartame is a carcinogen was started by a mass email hoax in the 90s. The information contained in the email was incorrect. The risk, in aspartame, for diabetics, is that it has been proven that the flavor triggers an insulin response, sometimes resulting in hypoglycemic episoes. Even saccharin was proved not to be a carcinogen, and removed from warning labels as a health risk in 2001. So keep sucking from the tin-foil hat tit.
Maltodextrin – Maltodextrin is found to metabolize as quickly as glucose, or dextrose. So yes, consuming it would bump blood sugars- in large amounts. There are trace amounts of it in crystal light. And I hate to burst your bubble, but diabetics CAN consume SOME sugar. So I have to wonder why this is even on here.
Acesulfame potassium – This sweetener is rarely seen on its own. It is generally used in company with another sweetener (commonly aspartame). It’s most common use is in the coating on pills, and in chewable vitamins. It was discovered in 1967, and found to be harmless in human trials, but caused a benign tumor response in rats (rats are not people, nor are they physiologically like people, and for that matter, the rats were fed the human equivalent of 1343 cans of diet soda per day in order to achieve that response). Like aspartame, Ace K triggers an insulin release in humans, but has not been proven to cause any hypoglycemia. The only conclusive side-effect of Ace K in humans is that it can create a preference toward sweets in utero.
I am not even going to bother with the dyes, because honestly, not drinking crystal light or other diet things is not going to prevent me from coming into contact with them. Food dyes are in everything, so really, it isn’t pertinent to this argument. I do agree that for the most part, when people feel the urge to snack, they are mistaking thirst for hunger, and I do recommend having water. I am a huge advocate for water. Not good enough? Have a glass of milk, or even -gasp- crystal light!
If you’re going to try to smack down artificial sweeteners, cite actual science. Don’t cite propagandized health sites that are created to sell products to desperate, gullible people. I’m not saying that there will never be new information about artificial sweeteners. But by the reasoning people continue to point them out as being potentially harmful, I could apply that to anything, artificial or otherwise.
They’ve learned that a diabetic consuming sugar in any more than small amounts can be fatal. So fuck off.
^^^^^^^^
Hey, all you people with working pancreases, you are welcome to not use artificial sweeteners in your own food.
Just don’t tell people who choose to use artificial sweeteners, be they diabetics or not, that they are being horrible and/or doing horrible things to their bodies by consuming their sweetener of choice.
Nothing’s Sweeter Than Life: Dangers of Drinking Crystal Light
(Source: https://www.youtube.com/)
Before making a diabetes joke, or tagging some sugary food as diabetes, watch this. Maybe you’ll realize how disrespectful and ignorant they really are.
There & Back Again: Here’s a short lesson for you:Someone posts a picture of a food item…
Here’s a short lesson for you:
Someone posts a picture of a food item that has a high sugar count. They tag it ‘diabetes’ because they mistakenly think sugar causes Diabetes. Diabetics who roam the tag then proceed to let that person know they did wrong. Of the following options, which do you…
To help you put it into perspective: Someone kicks you in the shin once by accident. You say “ow”, accept an apology and leave it at that. Someone kicks you in the shin for the thousandth time, accident or not, and you say “WHAT IN THE FUCKING CHRIST, YOU CLUMSY ASSHOLE.” I’ve stopped feeling sorry for the ignorant. And not just about diabetes. Willful ignorance isn’t an accident, it’s a choice.
The thing about most of the people who tag sugary or fatty foods with #diabetes? Saying anything, polite or otherwise, is not going to make them see that what they did was ignorant, hurtful, and continuing the spread of misinformation under the guise of “joking.” Because to them, that’s all it is: a joke. Because most of the time? It doesn’t affect them, and often times it doesn’t affect anyone they know and love, and because they’ve bought into the ideas that diabetes is caused by too much sugar or by eating to much and not exercising. They don’t want to know about the truth about diabetes, because they don’t see a need for the information. Because, clearly, only people who have diabetes need to know anything about diabetes.
There & Back Again: Here’s a short lesson for you:Someone posts a picture of a food item…
Kirkwall Was Totally Built On a Hellmouth 